![quicken 2016 update 5 fucked my computer quicken 2016 update 5 fucked my computer](https://s3.amazonaws.com/1xrun-news/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/14184140/updated-quicken-map.jpg)
This was much, much less than anyone else's compiler offering for the PC, and at that price, it was "too cheap to pirate" - you just sent Borland your $49.95 and moved on.
![quicken 2016 update 5 fucked my computer quicken 2016 update 5 fucked my computer](https://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/117316-n_081004_qbillslist.gif)
QUICKEN 2016 UPDATE 5 FUCKED MY COMPUTER SOFTWARE
Autodesk and Adobe have already moved to SaaS-only.īut is there a case to made for ongoing payments to fund ongoing support? Or is SaaS just an exploitative business model that's bad for customers but good for software vendors? Share your own thoughts in the comments.Īnd do you prefer one-time purchases or SaaS subscriptions?īack in the day, Turbo Pascal was $49.95, maybe about $100 in today's money. All perpetual software licenses may go away in the next six years. Slashdot reader dryriver sees a dire trend:Ĭurrent computing younglings may never know a future where you can actually run software locally on a PC you own, and/or not pay for it as SaaS. Perhaps Apple was the original source of the approach. Right now I'm unable to see any other solution than SaaS! Whatever the original cost, no matter what the software was supposed to do, it needs unending support. New bugs and security vulnerabilities keep being discovered, which means the product cannot EVER be regarded as completed.
![quicken 2016 update 5 fucked my computer quicken 2016 update 5 fucked my computer](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sObWcphnWwc/maxresdefault.jpg)
Long-time Slashdot reader shanen remembers the days of one-time software purchases, before companies began nudging customers to a subscription-based "software as a service" model: